By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

June 2023, Volume 73, Issue 6

Case Reports

Psychological intervention for a person living with amblyopia: a case study from home-based integrated care

Basharat Hussain  ( Department of Psychology, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. )
Muhammad Tahir Khalily  ( Department of Psychology, International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan )
Brian Hallahan  ( Department of Psychiatry, National University of Ireland, Galway. )


Amblyopia is a common developmental disability resulting in reduced visual acuity and gaze stability; it occurs in approximately 5% of the general population. Here, we present the case of an 18-year-old girl diagnosed with amblyopia. Subsequent to her diagnosis of amblyopia, she developed a depressive episode with co-morbid anxiety symptoms. She was treated with low intensity psychological intervention, Problem Management Plus, as home-based intervention. This intervention was associated both subjectively and objectively utilising psychometric measures (i.e. psychiatric interview, depression, anxiety and stress scale, general health questionnaire) with a significant amelioration of her mental state. This case provides preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of Problem Management Plus intervention and suggests that this intervention should be considered for other individuals with similar clinical presentations.


Keywords: Disability, amblyopia, low vision, Patient Management Plus.


DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.7304


Submission completion date: 07-07-2022


Acceptance date: 15-12-2022




Amblyopia is a developmental disorder and a common cause of reduced visual acuity in one eye in children worldwide.1,2 The most common risk factors for development of amblyopia are anisometria (a difference in refraction prescription for glasses between two eyes) and strabismus (misalignment of visual axes).3 Amblyopia is associated with an imbalance of input into the brain from both eyes leading to deficits in visual acuity and gaze stability.4 Consequently, amblyopia can lead to reduced motor skills, poorer depth perception, and reduced functional ability with preclusion of some vocational pursuits such as piloting aeroplanes in adulthood.5,6 Amblyopia is also associated with significant psychological sequelae, including low self-esteem, a negative self-image, and, on occasion, depressive episodes.7-9 Indeed, visual impairment due to any cause is associated with higher rates of major depressive disorder,10 further reducing the quality of life and functionality for those affected. However, the delivery of evidence-based psychosocial support can improve disability and improve the individuals’ quality of life and independence.11 The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recommended low-intensity psychological intervention for individuals with visual impairment and associated depressive symptomatology,12 deliverable by members of a psychiatry mental health multi-disciplinary team.

Problem management plus (PM+) is one low intensity manualised psychological intervention designed for individuals diagnosed with depressive and anxiety disorders,13,14 and has been utilised effectively in a Pakistani population.15 PM+ is based on behavioural techniques with its’ intervention sessions relating to problem solving, stress management, behavioural activation, and accessing social support techniques.16 It is usually conducted in five sessions, which are approximately of one-hour duration and can be conducted by any trained person (i.e. community health worker, social worker). Consequently, in the current study we examined the effectiveness of a PM+ intervention for the amelioration of depressive symptoms that occurred secondary to a diagnosis of amblyopia.


Case Report


Ms AB, an 18-year-old student, was referred by her treating ophthalmologist to the psychiatry outpatient clinic, which specialises in supporting individuals with mental health difficulties at the community-based inclusive development (CBID) centre in November 2021, Aid to Leprosy Patients, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, due to the presence of depressive symptoms.

AB reported that she first became aware of her visual acuity difficulties, when she was six years of age. She required glasses for myopia from the age of six years, with her right eye demonstrating significantly reduced visual acuity compared to her left eye. She did not have strabismus and no other ocular pathologies were diagnosed. Correction of her refractory difficulties with glasses did not improve her visual deficits, with her visual acuity slowly deteriorating over time. She never wore a patch or had pharmacological blurring of the better-seeing right eye. She has not experienced any injuries to her right eye, but reports ongoing loss of visual acuity and reduced functionality, which she relates in part to her loss of visual acuity and blurring of vision but also over the last six months to a reduction in her motivation levels.

Her personal history includes a normal full-term delivery and achievement of all developmental milestones appropriately, and a good academic performance at school. She denies any major physical illness or trauma during her childhood, with no bullying or other family conflicts. There is no family history of psychiatric or neurological problems and no history of amblyopia or other significant ocular pathology.

AB describes symptoms consistent with a depressive episode for approximately six months with anergia, reduced hedonic capacity and prominently depressed mood. Additionally, she described reduced concentration, self-confidence, and libido in recent months. Her symptoms are more prominent in the mornings. Her sleep pattern is consistent with early morning wakening and she has lost approximately 3kg over the last six months which she relates to a reduced appetite. She has no history of self-harm and denies suicidal ideation. She has no history of psychotic symptoms, such as delusions or perceptual abnormalities, including visual hallucinations (or illusions). She describes some associated anxiety symptoms which are not related to any fixed location or scenario and commenced after her depressive symptoms began. She demonstrated a good insight into her mental health difficulties and was happy for an appropriate intervention.

AB provided informed written consent for publishing the case report and ethical approval was attained from the Department of Psychology (IIU-FSS/PSY-DPEC/2021-252) and Bioethics Committee of the International Islamic University, Islamabad (IIU/2021-Exams-6511), to submit the case report for publication.

On review at the outpatient clinic, a number of psychometric measures were performed in the month of November 2021 to ascertain her level of symptomatology and associated functional impairment. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a 12-item self-report scale that is used to assess the psychological distress. In Pakistani population, the GHQ-12 is widely used to determine the presence or absence of psychological distress.17 This was only performed for baseline assessment. WHO Disability Assessment Scale (WHO-DAS 2.0) is a self-report scale used to assess disability among six domains: (i) cognition (i.e. communication skills), (ii) mobility, (iii) self-care (iv) getting along (i.e. ability to interact with others), (v) life activities (i.e. domestic responsibilities, leisure, and vocational or educational activities), and (vi) participation (i.e. engagement in community activities).18 Furthermore, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) is a 21-item self-report, encompassing three subscales (depression, anxiety, and stress) with each item measured on a 4-point Likert scale.19 The WHO-DAS and DASS were repeated immediately after the intervention and 14 weeks later to ascertain if any potential positive impacts of Problem Management Plus (PM+) were maintained. The PM+ is a psychological intervention which consist of five one-hour sessions, on a weekly basis by a community health worker, with full participation throughout the session. Key aspects of these sessions for AB resolved around problem solving, anxiety management skills, and increased socialisation.


The outcome of PM+ intervention was associated with a significant amelioration in disability levels as measured with the WHO-DAS. In particular, an improvement was noted at the completion of PM+ intervention in the domains of problems solving, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation, with further improvements noted 14 weeks later. Improvements in depressive anxiety and stress symptoms were noted utilising the DASS with a further improvement noted at the follow-up visit (Table 2).



AB herself noted that she was sleeping better (i.e. no early morning wakening) and described greater concentration levels for her course-work. She also noted that she was more confident in herself and was less anxious with less prominent physical symptoms of anxiety, though these were occasionally present (i.e. occasional tremulousness and nausea in social situations). Her symptoms continued to ameliorate following the completion of the PM+ intervention with only negligible symptoms evident at follow-up. She reported, “I found after the therapy sessions that I am more confident about myself and less preoccupied about my poor eye-sight” and “I felt some change in my life including mixing with people and increase in interaction with friends and relatives.”




In this case we investigated if PM+ was associated with an improvement in a range of symptomatology in an 18-year-old lady who was diagnosed with a depressive episode due to long-standing amblyopia. This intervention was associated with a significant amelioration in both depressive and anxiety symptoms with these improvements maintained at 14-week follow-up. Additionally, her overall functioning was improved with greater sociability, community engagement, and engagement in college work. The behavioural aspect of this intervention was optimal for this patient given the association of her symptoms to an obvious underlying stressor (amblyopia), with the characteristics of PM+ relating to anxiety management, problem solving, and accessing social support techniques appropriate for this lady’s difficulties. After the intervention concludes, individuals can continue to engage in practicing these techniques which was probably the scenario in this case.

Community health workers observed improvement in her symptoms to an obvious underlying stressor (amblyopia) as similar effects were noted in individuals with psychological distress.20 Moreover, the PM+ intervention was noted to be user-friendly by health workers during implementation.




This case report demonstrates that PM+ is a potentially effective psychological intervention for individuals experiencing depressive and anxiety symptoms due to amblyopia.


Recommendation: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are recommended in future to more clearly delineate the clinical efficacy of the PM+ in this patient cohort. The establishment of an integrated management plan for individuals diagnosed with amblyopia between ophthalmologists and mental health professionals to provide earlier access to psychological interventions is additionally recommended.


Acknowledgments: We are thankful to the World Health Organisation (WHO) for providing permission to use the Problem management plus (PM+) manual. We are also grateful to Aid to Leprosy Patients Rawalpindi-Pakistan for their co-operation.


Disclaimer: This manuscript is a part of the author’s research project titled, "Community Based Psychological Intervention for Persons Living with Disabilities (CBPI-PWD)", approved by the Board of Advanced Studies and Research (BASR) of the International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.


Conflict of Interest: None.


Source of Funding: None.




1.      Carlton J, Karnon J, Czoski-Murray C, Smith KJ, Marr J. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2008; 12(25): iii, xi-194

2.      Gilbert CE. Refractive Error Study in Children Study Group. Prevalence and causes of functional low vision in school-age children: results from standardised population surveys in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 877-81.

3.      Barrett BT, Bradley A, McGraw PV. Understanding the neural basis of amblyopia. Neuroscientist 2004; 10: 106-17.

4.      McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 2003; 3: 380-405.

5.      Birch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 33: 67-84.

6.      Hess RF, Thompson B, Baker DH. Binocular vision in amblyopia: structure, suppression and plasticity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 146-62.

7.      Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RP. Depression and anxiety in visually impaired older people. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 283-8.

8.      Mark JR, Kulinich AG, Scher LM, Mannis MJ. Vision loss and psychopathology. Pan Am J Ophthalmol 2021; 3: 7

9.      McCusker S, Koola MM. Association of ophthalmologic disorders and depression in the elderly: a review of the literature. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2015; 17: 10.4088/PCC.14r01731.

10.    Nyman SR, Gosney MA, Victor CR. Psychosocial impact of visual impairment in working-age adults. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1427-31.

11.    Watkinson S. Managing depression in older people with visual impairment. Nurs Older People 2011; 23: 23-8.

12.    World Health Organisation. The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: new understanding, new hope; 2001.

13.    World Health Organisation. Problem Management Plus (PM+): Individual psychological help for adults impaired by distress in communities exposed to adversity. World Health Organisation; 2016.

14.    World Health Organisation. Scalable psychological interventions for people in communities affected by adversity: a new area of mental health and psychosocial work at WHO. World Health Organisation; 2017.

15.    Hamdani SU, Huma ZE, Rahman A, Wang D, Chen T, van Ommeren M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of WHO problem management plus for adults with mood and anxiety disorders in a post-conflict area of Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. The Br J Psychiatry 2020; 217: 623-9.

16.    Dawson KS, Bryant RA, Harper M, Tay AK, Rahman A, Schafer A, et al. Problem Management Plus (PM+): a WHO transdiagnostic psychological intervention for common mental health problems. World Psychiatry 2015; 14: 354-7.

17.    Minhas FA, Mubbashar MH. Validation of General Health Questionnaire in a primary care setting of Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 1996; 6: 133-6.

18.    World Health Organisation. Measuring Health and Disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2010.

19.    Zafar H, Khalily MT. Didactic therapy for management of stress and co-morbid symptoms of depression and anxiety in Pakistani adolescents. Pakistan J Psychol Res 2015; 30: 131-49.

20.    Rahman A, Hamdani SU, Awan NR, Bryant RA, Dawson KS, Khan MF, et al. Effect of a multicomponent behavioural intervention in adults impaired by psychological distress in a conflict-affected area of Pakistan: a randomised clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316: 2609- 617.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: