By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

September 2022, Volume 72, Issue 9

Short Communication

Effects of sequential approach of positional release for subscapularis and OLA Grimsby technique on shoulder external rotation in adhesive

Ramish Saleem  ( Riphah College of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan. )
Muhammad Salman Bashir  ( Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan. )
Rabiya Noor  ( Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan. )

Abstract

A sample of 34 patients was randomly assigned to two Groups A and B (17 in each group). Positional release of subscapularis technique to Group A participants and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) (hold-relax) and anterior mobilisation technique were simultaneously applied to Group B participants. Data was collected from Nusrat Abdul Rauf Centre for Enablement and Faisal Hospital, Faisalabad, from August 30, 2018 to November 27, 2018. The duration of the treatment was four weeks with three sessions per week. The main outcome measures were Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and shoulder external rotation range of motion. The differences between Ola Grimsby group (Group B) and subscapularis release group (Group A) were statistically significant for pain, disability and shoulder range of motion (p-value<0.05) with higher mean values for Ola Grimsby group. This study concluded that the sequential effects of Ola Grimsby technique are better as compared to positional release of subscapularis in terms of reducing pain and improving shoulder external rotation range of motion.

 

Keywords: Pain, Frozen Shoulder

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.0447

 

Introduction

 

Adhesive capsulitis (also known as frozen shoulder) is a major health problem because of its high prevalence. It is a painful and debilitating disorder of unknown cause. 1 It is recognised as a painful condition with a sudden onset, characterised by pain, tightness, and trouble in sleeping. 2 It can be categorised as primary and secondary. Primary refers to the condition with an unknown cause, whereas secondary frozen shoulder is related to previous history of trauma, surgery or any other underlying systemic disease. 3 Provoking conditions may be diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cervical degenerative diseases, respiratory infections, thyrotoxicosis, joint inflammation, rotator cuff pathologies, and fractures related to the shoulder joint. 4 The limitation in motion ranges usually occurs following a typical capsular pattern; external rotation being the most apprehensive, followed by abduction and then internal rotation depicting major involvement of internal rotators of the shoulder and obliteration of joint capsule. 5 A variety of interventional techniques have been applied in physical therapy for the management of pain, restoration of range of motion, and early return to functional independence. These applications comprise anti-inflammatory injections, manipulative therapy, exercise therapy, massage techniques, electrotherapeutic modalities as well as education of the patient. 6,7 A study described the use of mobilisation techniques for end of range of motion in patients with shoulder pathology. The study was conducted on a small population by using convenient sampling technique. Both male and female patients with pain and more than half of limited shoulder movements were included. The study results represented gains regarding pain relief and improved mobility. Movements of external rotation and abduction improved most importantly. 8 The usefulness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques were studied involving male and female subjects and the outcomes demonstrated significant improvement in shoulder pain score over time and abduction range of movement. Another study, carried out to ascertain the effects of different types of mobilisation techniques on adhesive capsulitis, showed that Maitland mobilisations have greater effects in terms of increasing ROM and reducing pain and is highly recommended for frozen shoulder patients. 9,10 The effects of mobilisation and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) in frozen shoulder patients were studied in conjunction with ultrasound. PNF utilises stretching inhibitory techniques where the duration of isometric contraction is 3-6 seconds, followed by 10 seconds of voluntary relaxation of muscle for further elongation of the muscle to new range. PNF produced results of improved range of motion by tissue elongation whereas mobilisation reduced ischaemia, oedema formation, and inflammation, and, hence, lessens joint effusion and pain. The study results concluded that the effects produced by PNF are greater as compared to mobilisation. An interventional study by Nehal K. Kalasva, considered the effects of Myofascial release to subscapularis and PNF in improving the external rotation range of shoulder. Myofascial release is a procedure of applying specific manual forces with a goal to make myofascial modifications, in order to improve the length of contracted structures. Axilla is the region where palpation of subscapularis and then locating shortened bands, thereby any restricted areas, or hyper-irritable points is possible. The study outcomes revealed high improvements in lateral rotation by applying PNF. 11 The effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on shoulder range of motion in overhand athletes were reported. Contract-relax-contract and hold-relax-contract techniques applied on both male and female participants proved effective in improving outer rotation range of motion when performed consistently two times a week for six weeks. 12 In this study, effects of a combination of Hold-relax and Shoulder Mobilisation are addressed in terms of pain, disability, and ROM in patients with adhesive capsulitis as in previous literature both techniques were used separately for immediate effects. Unfortunately effects of sequential application of these techniques have not been addressed yet. So, there is a dire need to explore the magnitude of these effects in symptomatic population. 13

 

Patients/Methods and Results

 

This study was a Quasi Experimental Trial. The number of study subjects was calculated to be 34 by using the G power software 3.91 version. 14 By using range of motion (Mean±Std. deviation) from previous studies, 2 36 patients were recruited (in order to avoid any drop-outs and follow-up) by assuming 10% attrition rate with power of 80%, 5% margin of error and 95% confidence interval. Data was collected from Nusrat Abdul Rauf Centre for Enablement and Faisal Hospital, Faisalabad, from August 30, 2018 to November 27, 2018.  Purposive sampling technique was used. Patients were included in the study after they signed a consent form. Group A was treated with Positional release subscapularis (identified restrictions were treated with Myofascial Release Technique utilising a combination of sustained manual pressure and slow deep strokes for seven minutes). Group B was provided with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (hold relax) technique and mobilisation simultaneously. Patients were provided hold-relax with five repetitions and simultaneously anterior mobilisation with 15-20 repetitions per session. These techniques were applied thrice a week, for four weeks. Moist heat was applied as a baseline treatment for 10-15 minutes. Inclusion criteria were age between 40 and 60 years, only females, shoulder pain for more than three months and limitation of external rotation ≤ 60 degrees. Patients were excluded if they exhibited any red flags (malignancy, 15 metabolic diseases, 16 rheumatoid arthritis, 17 osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, etc.), neurological involvement, 18 history of recent shoulder trauma; fracture of humerus, scapula or clavicle, rotator cuff injuries, previous surgery, recurrent dislocation or subluxation of shoulder, and severe pain unrelieved by resting the joint. 19 The socio-demographic variables of the two groups were compared showing that both the groups were equal (Table 1). Base line measurement for Numeric Pain Rating Scale score, Shoulder Pain & Disability Index score and shoulder functional mobility (Table 2) shows that both the groups were equal and comparable. The results were calculated using Independent t-test for between group comparison of NPRS, SPADI and shoulder functional mobility (Table 3).

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

This study concluded that effects of sequential application of mobilisation and PNF were more significant in reducing pain and improving shoulder external rotation as compared to subscapularis release technique in adhesive capsulitis.

 

Disclaimer: None.

 

Conflict of Interest: None.

 

Funding Sources: None.

 

References

 

1.       Haveela B, Dowle P, Chandrasekhar P. Effectiveness of Mulligan’s Technique and Spencer’s Techniquein Adjunct to Conventional Therapy in Frozen Shoulder: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Int j adv res dev 2018;3:253-60.

2.       Anwer Z, Kumar S. To study the effectiveness of g.d maitland Mobilization versus laser therapy in adhesive capsulities. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5:2371-8. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2017.212

3.       Iqbal M, Riaz H, Ghous M, Masood K. Comparison of Spencer muscle energy technique and Passive stretching in adhesive capsulitis: A single blind randomized control trial. J Pak Med Assoc 2020;70:2113-8. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.23971.

4.       Jason JI, Ganesh Sundaram S, Vengata Subramani M. Physiotherapy interventions for adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: A systematic review. Int J Physiother Res 2015;3:1318-25. DOI: 10.16965/ ijpr.2015.198.

5.       Saggini R, Carmignano SM, Cosenza L, Palermo T, Bellomo RG. The Role of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Shoulder Disorders. In: Sonar SB, eds. Advances in Shoulder Surgery. London, UK: IntechOpen Limited, 2018; pp e70344. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen. 70344.

6.       Do Moon G, Lim JY, Kim DY, Kim TH. Comparison of Maitland and Kaltenborn mobilization techniques for improving shoulder pain and range of motion in frozen shoulders. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:1391-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1391.

7.       Sreenivasu K, Paul Daniel VK, Subramanian MB, Sajeevan T. Effectiveness of end range mobilization with scapular mobilization in frozen shoulder. Int Arch Integr Med 2016;3: 53-8.

8.       Ali SA, Khan M. Comparison for efficacy of general exercises with and without mobilization therapy for the management of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder - An interventional study. Pak J Med Sci 2015;31:1372-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.316.7909.

9.       Tedla JS, Sangadala DR. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2019;19:482-91.

10.     Pratiksha G, Shobha B, Deshpande NK. Immediate Effecton External Rotation And Overhead Reach In Patients Withshoulder Pathology Using Proprioceptive Neuromuscularfascilitation And Soft Tissue Mobilization. Int J Physiother Res 2017;5:2259-64. DOI: 10.16965/ ijpr.2017.183.

11.     Kalasva NK, Shukla YU. To study the immediate effect of myofascial release with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for Subscapularis on Glenohumeral External Rotation in shoulder periarthritis-an interventional study. Indian J Phys Ther 2014;2:30-3.

12.     Decicco PV, Fisher MM. The effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on shoulder range of motion in overhand athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2005;45:183-7.

13.     Zavala-González J, Pavez-Baeza F, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H, Olguín-Huerta C. The effectiveness of joint mobilization techniques for range of motion in adult patients with primary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medwave 2018;18:e7265. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2018.05.7265.

14.     Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 1996;28:1-11.

15.     Pedersen AB, Horváth-Puhó E, Ehrenstein V, Rørth M, Sørensen HT. Frozen shoulder and risk of cancer: a population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer 2017;117:144-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.146.

16.     Austin DC, Gans I, Park MJ, Carey JL, Kelly JD. The association of

metabolic syndrome markers with adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1043-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.004.

17.     Bilberg A, Bremell T, Balogh I, Mannerkorpi K. Significantly impaired shoulder function in the first years of rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:261. doi: 10.1186/s13075- 015-0777-0.

18.     Neal S, Fields KB. Peripheral nerve entrapment and injury in the

upper extremity. Am Fam Physician 2010;81:147-55.

19.     Al Shammari M, Hassan A, Al Jawad M, Farea A, Almansour A, Al Yousif G, et al. Pancoast Tumor: The Overlooked Etiology of Shoulder Pain in Smokers. Am J Case Rep 2020;21:e926643. doi:

10.12659/AJCR.926643.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: